Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: forging of valuable security in Dr. Jesim Pais vs State Of Nct Delhi & Anr on 6 December, 2022Matching Fragments
8. But that apart, it is submitted that even proceeding solely on the allegations made and the documents on which they are based, no offence as alleged or otherwise is made-out against the petitioner inter-alia for the following reasons :
8.1. Firstly, an invoice is not a 'valuable security' within the meaning of section 30 IPC and therefore the offence under section 467 IPC of forging a valuable security is ex-facie not made-out;
8.2. Secondly, the ingredients of the offence under section 420 IPC are also completely missing inasmuch as, even as per the allegations, no case is made-out of the petitioner having induced anyone to deliver any property or valuable security to him;
8.3. Thirdly, it is submitted that since the offence of forging a valuable security under section 467 and cheating under section 420 IPC are not made-out, the question of offences under sections 468 and 471 IPC of committing forgery for the purposes of cheating, are also not made-out.
11.1. The foundational offence that is subject matter of the present case is an offence under section 467 IPC, viz. of forging a valuable security. Prima-facie it would appear that such an allegation must relate to forgery committed by a person to create a document that in itself contains some monetary value;