Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. Arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties were heard, when learned counsel for the applicants reiterated the content of the OA and the rejoinder. He specifically placed reliance on judgment dated 15.10.2014 in OA No.2064 of 2014 titled Chet Ram Meena & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors. of C.A.T. Principal Bench, New Delhi at Annexure A-25, wherein it had been recorded as follows:-

6. On perusal of the above judgment, we are convinced that the settled position is that on inter-zonal transfers on their own requests while the employees accept bottom seniority they do not forgo the earlier service rendered by them before such transfer. Such service should, therefore, be counted while considering their cases for promotion provided they are falling within the zone of consideration as per their position in the seniority list. Therefore, sub clause (2) of Note-I of Clause 2 of Notification dated 24.3.2005 is contrary to the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforementioned cases and deserves to be quashed.