Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Motion Re in Amit Khurana vs State Of Haryana on 21 December, 2021Matching Fragments
20. However, the bail applicant may also, if no valid incriminatory evidence becomes collected against him through the investigating officer concerned, lawfully marshaling incriminatory evidence (supra), thereupon, re- motion this Court, and, also he may upon his making an effort to prima-facie exhibit his innocence through his placing on record the above referred records, rather subsequently make a re-motion.
21. The further reason for declining bail to the bail applicant, is also grooved in the fact, that all the afore inferences are to be drawn, rather for ensuring that the provisions in the NDPS Act, as appertaining to inculpate conspirators, do not become otiose, and, also to ensure that the foot soldiers carrying contraband at the site of occurrence are alongwith the drug mafia or the drug warlords, who make supplies to the foot soldiers are along with them brought to inculpation.