Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: generated by computer in State vs . : 1) Rohit Khatri @ Shiva on 15 November, 2018Matching Fragments
handed over the said mobile phone to the IO. There was an auto call recorder app in the mobile phone. In the folder there was recording of various conversations between Sushil, Shiva and Mota etc. IO heard the conversations between the above named persons. Virender recognized the voice of his son and his friend. Witness Hitesh also recognized the voice of Rohit, Sushil and Gaurav etc. IO picked up the transcript of the conversation dated 13.12.2017 among the above named persons. He obtained the computer generated print out of the conversation running into seven pages Ex.PW1/P4. He identified the mobile phone along with the SIM card and the memory card as Ex.MO1. The MO3 that is the CDI data of MCI is played on the deskdop and he identified that it is the same conversation which he heard on the mobile phone.
79. Sh. Pawan Singh, Nodal Officer Vodafone Idea was examined as PW-28. He proved the record of mobile phone No.9654184905. According to the record it was issued in the name of Dinesh Kumar s/o Sh. Krishan Kumar R/o H.No.67, Behind Hari Narayan Mandir Pana Mamur pur. He proved the computer generated copy of customer application form as Ex.PW28/P93. The call detail record of this number for the period 25.12.2017 to 10.01.18 is proved as Ex.PW28/P94. The certificate u/s 65B Evidence Act is proved as State Vs. Rohit Khatri SC No. 237/18 :: 41 ::
Ex.PW28/P95. The testimony of witness has gone unchallenged and uncontroverted.
80. Israr Babu, alternate Nodal Officer was examined as PW-29. He proved the record of mobile phone No.9643120097. According to the customer application form this number was issued in the name of Sushil Khatri S/o Sh. Nahar Singh R/o H.No.116 Nai Basti, Panna Mamur Pur, near Hanuman Mandir, Narela Delhi. The computer generated copy of the customer application form is proved as Ex.PW29/P96. The call detail record of this number for the period 25.12.2017 to 10.01.2018 is proved as Ex.PW29/P97. The certificate u/s 65B Evidence Act is proved as Ex.PW29P98.
83. Sh. Chander Shekhar Nodal Officer, Bharti Airtel Ltd., was examined as PW-30. He proved the record of mobile phone number 9958558382. As per the customer application form this number was issued in the name of Sushil S/o Sh. Nahar Singh R/o H.No.116 Nai Basti Pana Mamur Pur near Hanuman Mandir Narela. The photocopy of the customer application form is proved as Ex.PW30/P107. The photocopy of the passport annexed with the customer application form is proved as Ex.PW30/P108. The call detail record of the above said number for the period 25.12.2017 to 10.01.2018 is proved as Ex.PW30/P109. The computer generated copy State Vs. Rohit Khatri SC No. 237/18 :: 43 ::