Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of the Writ Petition No.7802/2015 are narrated hereunder.

2. Present writ petition has been filed by the five petitioners against the order dated 17.09.2015 passed by the District Magistrate in exercise of powers conferred under Section 6(D) of the Explosive Act 1984 r/w Rules 118 of the Explosive Rules, 2008 cancelling the licence granted in favour of the petitioners under the Explosive Act. Present petition has also been filed against the order dated 05.11.2015 passed by the learned Commissioner, Ujjain Division, Ujjain.

6. Again reply was filed and finally, the order has been passed on 17.09.2015 on account of violation of provisions of Explosive Act r/w Rules, 2008 and appeal has been dismissed on 05.11.2015 in all cases. The aforesaid facts HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH AT INDORE W.P. No.7802/15 (-3-) relate to the cancellation of the licence of the petitioner No.1. In respect of petitioner No.2, the same procedure was followed and licence was cancelled on 17.09.2015 and the appeal was dismissed on 05.11.2015. In respect of petitioner Nos.3, 4 and 5, dates are same in respect of cancellation of licence and dismissal of the appeal.

10. This Court as the respondents have followed the prescribed procedure as provided in the Explosive Rules, 2008 r/w Explosive Act, 1984, does not find any reason to interfere with the impend order. Resultantly, both the writ petitions stand dismissed.



                                                 (S.C. Sharma)
N.R.                                                  Judge






 Date: 2018.02.26 11:49:35 +05'30'