Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(iii) Further directing the respondents not to enforce any illegal recovery amount to Rs.2,15,097/- from the pension account of the applicant.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the applicant joined at Electronics Test and Development Centre (in short ETDC), Solan on 07.07.1981 which was subsequently taken over by the respondents in 1986. The applicant is re-designated as Administrative-cum-Accounts Officer (A.A.O.) and posted at ETDC, Solan. He was transferred to ETDC Jaipur (Respondent No. 2) on 03.07.2001. He was given the charge of AAO of Respondent No. 2 vide order dated 17.07.2001. On the same day, the applicant was directed by Sh. G.J. Gyani, the then Senior Director (retired now) in his own capacity to take charge of Drawing and Disbursing Officer of IIQM, Jaipur. It has been submitted that the applicant was neither transferred to IIQM, Jaipur nor was its AAO. It has been pleaded that the revenue receipts from IIQM, Jaipur were being received by the Superintendent and Assistants under the supervision of Administrative Officer of IIQM while the applicant was forcefully asked to endorse office expenditure cheques/vouchers of IIQM, Jaipur under the supervision of Administrative Officer, IIQM, under its overall control and supervision. He further averred that the decade old disputed Personnel Deposit Account (Opened and Operated by IIQM, Jaipur) is made non-operational and closed in December 2002 after still resistance and refusal by the applicant in signing its cheques/vouchers.