Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

20. Arguments have been addressed by learned counsel for the accused as well as learned Additional PP for the State.

21. Learned Additional PP has contended that prosecutrix has fully supported the case of the prosecution and that prosecution has succeeded in proving its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt by examining the material witnesses namely prosecutrix and her parents. It is stated that in view of the testimony of the prosecutrix no other evidence is required and has accordingly prayed that accused Satender Kumar be convicted u/s.363/366/376 IPC.

50. The nutshell of foregoing discussion is that I am of the considered opinion that the prosecution has successfully proved that accused induced prosecutrix P, a minor girl aged about 13 years, and obtained her consent by concealing the fact that he was already married and was having a girl child from the said wedlock. The prosecution SC No. 37/12 State Vs. Satender Chauhan Page Nos. 32 of 40 has further proved that the accused induced the prosecutrix P and obtained her said consent with intention to have illicit relations with him and to compel her to marry him and under the said inducement, he took the prosecutrix P to a house situated at Sarai Pipal Thala and committed rape upon her from 10.11.2011 to 21.11.2011 and as such the prosecution has succeeded in proving the guilt of the accused Satender on the face of record, beyond the reasonable doubts. Accordingly, I hold guilty accused Satender for the offences u/s. 363/366/376 IPC and he is convicted accordingly.

File be consigned to the record room. 

(Announced in the open Court )                                    (Illa Rawat)
(Today on 06.12.2013)                                       Addl. Sessions Judge
                                                                    (North­West)­01
                                                                      Rohini/Delhi  




 SC No. 37/12                    State Vs. Satender Chauhan                        Page Nos. 33 of 40


            IN THE COURT OF MS. ILLA RAWAT  : ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE 
                             (NORTH­WEST)­01, ROHINI : DELHI



(Sessions Case No. 37/12)


Unique ID case No. 02404R0109302012


State        Vs.    Satender Chauhan

U/s            :       363/366/376 IPC   
P.S.           :       Mahendra Park 


State          Vs.                          Satender Chauhan 
                                            s/o Ram Ashish Chauhan



09.12.2013


Present :    Ld. Addl. PP for the State. 

             Convict produced from J.C. 

             Legal Aid Counsel Ms. Urmila Yadav for the convict.


ORDER ON THE POINT OF SENTENCE

(i) For the offence u/s 363 IPC, the convict Satender Chauhan is sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years along with a fine of Rs. 2,000/­(Rs. Two thousand only), in default of payment of fine, to undergo S.I for three months.

(ii) For the offence u/s 366 IPC, the convict Satender Chauhan is sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of five years along with a fine of Rs. 2,000/­(Rs. Two thousand only), in default of payment of fine, to undergo S.I for three months.