Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

apprentices of Ordnance 'factories would,be given reference over ex-trade apprentices of other Organizatibns thé9àrecdnversantIin jobs in Ordinance ".

factories and have beèrrtFained IOr&idnàefctoriesinctrring expenditure on ,_••.'- -- 

                                        j • -       I
                                                    f   .•. S.
                                I•   '•                                /


such training.                                      y .Y')            •'

                            I                   .
                                                            .
St, candidates were to the basis of merit in accordàn6e with marks in the lW. rite be called for trade test (practical . test) of 100 mark in the ratio of 1:3 to the number of vacancies in the respectië tradeT Final merit was to be decided on the basis of combined marks in the written and trade test (practical test). In the selection process other things being equal i.e. marks being equal, trained Ex- Trade Apprentices of RFI and sister ordnance factories were to be given preference in the order in which they were stated. In between the trained Ex- Trade Apprentice of RFI, preference were to be given to those who were senior i.e. if two or more Ex-Trade Apprentices secured same marks then preference were to be given on the basis of seniority. Seniority of ex-trade apprentices of RFI were to be decided on the basis of OFB's letter No. 13/08/03-AHRD dated 15/17.12.2003. Similarly, in between trained apprentices of Ordnance Factories preference were to be given to those who were senior. In all other case of tie, the 4 O.A. 350.00715.2012 WITH M.A. 350.00517.2012 selection was to be decided on the basis of marks obtained in the written examination only.

That, it was also indicated in the advertisement that Ex-Trade Apprentices of Ordnance Factories were to be given preference over ex trade apprentices of other organizations as they were conversant with jobs in Ordnance Factories and had been trained by Ordnance Factories incurring expenditure on such training.

That, the applicant, an OBC by caste, was an ex-Trade Apprentice of RFI who had successfully completed the course of apprenticeship training under Apprentices Act, 1961 at RFI in the trade of Elec./Mech. in 2010 and had applied for the post of Examiner (Engineering) in response to the above cited advertisement.

Nowhere;the applicant has disputed her marks or had established that she had obtained mbre marks than the last candidate under OBC category as per the OBC select list and consequently, we find the applicant has failed to qualify on merit which was the basis of selection as contained in notification dated 1218th November, 2011 (Annexure A-3 to the O.A.). The respondents have also clarified that in the selection process, other things being equal, that is, marks being equal, trained Ex-Trade Apprentices of RH and sister Ordnance factories were to be given preference and that between trained Ex-Trade Apprentices of RFI preference were to be given to those,.who were senior and such seniority was to be decided on the basis of OrdnanqeFactbfiesas per letter dated 15,3.2003 and S ,-