Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Pay upgradation in Gajendra Kumar vs M/O Human Resource Development on 5 January, 2018Matching Fragments
8. In Anil Kumar and Others Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi in OA No.2835/2011 and batch, the applicants who were working as Primary School Teachers, Trained Graduate Teachers and Post Graduate Teachers in the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi and were appointed on or before 31.12.2005, filed the OAs seeking the identical reliefs. The said batch of OAs were disposed of by a common order dated 22.12.2014 of the CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi as under:-
"10. We have heard the learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Padma Kumar S. and learned counsel for the respondents Ms. Ishita Barua for Shri Gaurang Kanth, in this case. The substantive question for consideration in this case is whether the direct recruits who have been appointed prior to 0.01.2006 can be placed at a lower pay scale than those direct recruits who have been appointed after 01.01.2006. The applicants were in the pre-revised scale of Rs.5000-8000/- and were drawing the basic pay between Rs.5300 to Rs.5900/- as on 31.12.2005. The fixation of pay w.e.f. 01.01.2006 after the acceptance of the 6th Pay Commission was made in terms of the Central Civil Service (Revised) Pay Rules, 2008. The said statutory rule upgraded the pay scale of Rs.5000- 8000/- to Rs.7450-11500/- and then brought the Staff Nurses to PB 2 pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 with the grade pay of Rs.4600/-. In between the scales of Rs.5000-8000/- and Rs.7450-11500, there were two more scales in the pre-revised scale, viz., Rs.5500-9000 and Rs.6500-10500/-. As both Rs.5000-8000 and Rs.7450-11500 are the 5th Central Pay Commission scales, the 6th Central Pay Commission cannot give the upgraded pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 to a date prior to 01.01.2006. The upgraded pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 was to happen as on 01.01.2006 and thereafter the conversion to the 6th CPC PB2 scale of Rs.9300-34800/- was to be made. The minimum pay in the pay band for a person even with Rs.7450/- is to get Rs.13860/- as per the said statutory rule. Therefore, there should have been some provision for fixation of pay in the revised pay scale of 6th CPC, when pre-revised pay scale has been upgraded to a level after skipping two intermediate scales, so that the employees who have been serving in the pre- revised scales for years are not falling below at least the corresponding minimum of the 6th CPC revised scales of the upgraded pay scale. However, Revised Pay Rules, 2008 did not contain any such provision for upgradation after skipping two intermediate scales. But at the same time, the said Rules stipulate that all Direct Recruits in the Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- appointed as on 01.01.2006 or after would get a minimum of pay in the pay band of Rs.12540/- (excluding Grade Pay) (which will make their basic pay including Grade Pay Rs.12540 + 4600 =Rs.17140/-).
Let a copy of this order be sent to Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, for being circulated to departments, which are indulging in incorrect fixation of pay in the upgraded pay scales at higher stages causing loss to public revenue/funds".
9. In Mrs. Malbika Deb Gupta VS. UOI & Others in OA No.98/2014 and batch (cases pertaining to Railway employees), another Bench of the CAT, New Delhi after examining an identical issue, allowed the OAs by order dated 27.03.2015, as under:-
"10. We have heard the learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Padma Kumar S. and learned counsel for the respondents Ms. Ishita Barua for Shri Gaurang Kanth, in this case. The substantive question for consideration in this case is whether the direct recruits who have been appointed prior to 01.01.2006 can be placed at a lower pay scale than those direct recruits who have been appointed after 01.01.2006. The applicants were in the pre-revised scale of Rs.5000-8000/- and were drawing the basic pay between Rs.5300 to Rs.5900/- as on 31.12.2005. The fixation of pay w.e.f. 01.01.2006 after the acceptance of the 6th Pay Commission was made in terms of the Central Civil Service (Revised) Pay Rules, 2008. The said statutory rule upgraded the pay scale of Rs.5000- 8000/- to Rs.7450-11500/- and then brought the Staff Nurses to PB 2 pay scale of Rs.9300-34800 with the grade pay of Rs.4600/-. In between the scales of Rs.5000-8000/- and Rs.7450-11500, there were two more scales in the pre-revised scale, viz., Rs.5500-9000 and Rs.6500-10500/-. As both Rs.5000-8000 and Rs.7450-11500 are the 5th Central Pay Commission scales, the 6th Central Pay Commission cannot give the upgraded pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 to a date prior to 01.01.2006. The upgraded pay scale of Rs.7450-11500 was to happen as on 01.01.2006 and thereafter the conversion to the 6th CPC PB2 scale of Rs.9300-34800/- was to be made. The minimum pay in the pay band for a person even with Rs.7450/- is to get Rs.13860/- as per the said statutory rule. Therefore, there should have been some provision for fixation of pay in the revised pay scale of 6th CPC, when pre-revised pay scale has been upgraded to a level after skipping two intermediate scales, so that the employees who have been serving in the pre- revised scales for years are not falling below at least the corresponding minimum of the 6th CPC revised scales of the upgraded pay scale. However, Revised Pay Rules, 2008 did not contain any such provision for upgradation after skipping two intermediate scales. But at the same time, the said Rules stipulate that all Direct Recruits in the Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- appointed as on 01.01.2006 or after would get a minimum of pay in the pay band of Rs.12540/- (excluding Grade Pay) (which will make their basic pay including Grade Pay Rs.12540 + 4600 =Rs.17140/-). Admittedly, the applicants have had several years of service as direct recruit Staff Nurses as on 01.01.2006 were granted the pay in the pay band ranging from Rs.9860 to Rs.10980/- excluding Grade Pay as against the direct recruit with the same educational qualification and conditions of service who joins on 01.01.2006 who would get Rs.12540/- (excluding Grade Pay). Therefore, the Applicants are entitled to get at least the minimum of Rs.13860/- (Rs.18460 with Grade Pay) as on 01.01.2006 but in any eventuality not less than Rs.12540/- (Rs.17140/- with Grade Pay) as on 01.01.2006, as the same post when held by a direct recruit who joins on or after 01.01.2006 and one who joined as direct recruit years earlier, cannot be given different pay scales, that too prejudicial to the persons who joined much earlier as it would violate Article 39 (d) of the Constitution of India which has now assumed the level of a Fundamental Right and also Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution being irrational and arbitrary. The settled law is that no rules can be made in violation of the provisions contained in the Constitution of India.
Let a copy of this Order be placed in all the three cases."
21 OA No.825/2016 and connected OAs10. In W.P. (C) No.8058/2015 and batch filed against Malbika Dev Gupta (supra) and various other cases, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi by its common order dated 04.11.2016 held as under:-
"11. One cannot accept that the same post can have two different pay scales, one for existing employees performing the same tasks and doing the same work on the ground that they were appointed or have been functioning on the said post prior to 1.1.2006, whereas a person appointed later in point of time would get the higher pay scale. Logically and as sequitor, the argument of the Union of India that where new appointments or promotions were made, the employees working on the posts would immediately get the benefit of pay under Rule 7A Clause (ii)is wrong and fallacious. The principle of upgradation of pya of the senior on the junior getting a higher pay scale is applicable in certain situations. Note 2A does not prescribe and record any such percept.