Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 366A in Rishab Sharma vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Another on 19 May, 2023Matching Fragments
______________________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
The instant petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by petitioner, with a prayer to quash and set-aside FIR No. 16 of 2019, dated 09.04.2019, registered against him at Police Station Brow, District Kullu, H.P., under Sections 363, 366A, 376 IPC read with Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(i) w (i) of SC & ST Act and the consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR.
3. Respondent No. 1/State filed reply to the petition, wherein it is averred that the instant petition is not maintainable, as the petitioner has committed heinous crime with a minor and after completion of investigation, there was sufficient material against the petitioner, so the petitioner was booked under Section 363, 366A, 376 IPC, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(i)w(i) of the SC & ST Act. It is further averred that in case the instant petition is allowed, it will cause prejudice to the complainant and the society as well. Lastly, it is prayed that the instant petition be .
Accordingly, F.I.R. bearing No. 16/2019, dated 09.04.2019, .
registered at Police Station Brow, District Kullu, H.P., under Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(i) w (i) of SC & ST Act, as well as consequent proceedings arising out of the said FIR, pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court quashed and set aside.