Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

11. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that one Sri Sanjib Kr. Saha was appointed on the alternative category of commercial apprentice in grade Rs.5500-9000/- and there was post of Commercial Superintendent, but the same has not been extended to the applicant. That the applicant was declared failed in C-1 medical category, but declared passed in C-2 medical category. The respondents have given proper explanation in the compliance report. In para 9 of the report it has been alleged that Sri Sanjib Kr. Saha, who was also provided the alternative appointment on having been failed in requisite medical category for which he was originally recruited. However, it is found that Sh. Sanjib Kumar Saha was recruited as Traffic Apprentice for which the medical classification was A-2. However, he was not found fit in his original appointment as Commercial Apprentice by the Competent Authority keeping in view his educational qualification and vacancies in the category in which the element of direct recruitment was involved. As directed by the Honble CAT/ALD, your case has also been considered on the same lines, but your case incongruent with that of Sh. Sanjib Kr. Saha as you are found unfit in medical category C-1, but found fit in medical category C-2. The direct recruitment element is involved in such categories for which medical classification is C-2 is only the case of Catering Inspector, but you do not possess the required educational qualification prescribed for the post of Catering Inspector. And hence the case of the applicant was also considered on the same lines as of Sri Sanjib Kumar Saha and it cannot be said that the similar treatment has not been given to the applicant in giving alternative appointment.