Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

22. In_the":.1;y~eculiar 7fects:"af.nvdV.'circumstances of the case, we fee§i..gVh'et eeteblished between use of M'Q_..f10 'iniurii caused to the person of the victint' and that implies that the user is the accus4ed--vaAnd .'"he.i'ésdti1e author of such injury. Since :'V:'._v.deetVi$":'hia5%is j're§uited"Wfi*Vom such an injury; he is also '%oepe"nsit.$fIe._foif--the homicidal death of the victim. The 4 ofien-see tl§'erei'ete falls within the ambit of Section 300 of IPC R"""--..V'é'ndVLnot-tinder its exception. The evidence referred to A ja'bVoue.u.--'is therefore, convincing and is clincher to show that