Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: fodder scam in Pratik vs The State Of Jharkhand Through Home ... on 11 March, 2026Matching Fragments
11. Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.5- informant has not raised this objection.
12. Roster notified w.e.f. 09.01.2026 and 16.02.2026, so far as this Court is concerned, is stipulated as under:
9 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay (Monday to . A.B.A.- Fresh filing, Orders & Admission Kumar Dwivedi Friday) . Criminal Revision :- Fresh Filing, Orders, (Whole day) Admission & Hearing . A.B.A.; B.A.; Cr.M.P.; Cr.Rev. & Criminal Writ relating to Delhi Police Establishment Act (CBI) and P.C. Act :- Fresh Filing, Orders, Admission & Hearing . All matters related to Fodder Scam:- Orders, Admission & Hearing . Tied-up & Assigned matters
13. From reading of the above roster, it is crystal clear that this Bench has been assigned to hear the matters like A.B.A., Criminal Revision, B.A., Cr.M.P., Criminal Review and Criminal Writ relating to Delhi Police Establishment Act (CBI) and P.C. Act- fresh filing, orders, admission and hearing matters and the matters related to fodder scam. In the present criminal writ petition, the ( 2026:JHHC:6369 ) prayer (ii) is made for transferring the investigation of the allegations made in FIR being Airport P.S. Case No.5 of 2026 to an independent agency such as Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct free and impartial investigation. The roster said the criminal writ relating to Delhi Police Establishment Act (CBI) and P.C. Act, which clearly suggests that this is the roster of this Bench. On the first date, when this matter was taken up on 16.01.2026, Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel had appeared on behalf of the State of Jharkhand through Video Conferencing and he had simply requested the Court to allow him time to file counter affidavit and, thereafter, the matter may kindly be heard. On that day, he had not taken such objection. This Court has not made the present petition as part-heard. The Registry of this Court has suo motu listed the matter on different dates, as noted herein above.