Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

31. It was lastly contended on behalf of the revenue that this court while refraining a question could not reopen an enquiry. The questions of fact or law were limited by the order of the Tribunal.

32. The revenue cited a decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Smt. Anusuya Devi [1968] 68 ITR 750.

33. On behalf of the revenue the following decisions were also cited.

34. CIT v. Turner Morrison & Co. Ltd. , Shankar Industries v. CIT , Reform Flour Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. v. CIT . It is not necessary to deal with the above decisions in detail.