Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 07.07.2022 passed by the District Commission in Consumer Complaint No. 353/2021 titled as Dulan Gogoi vs. Arsh property expert Pvt. Ltd., wherein the right of the Revisionist/Opposite Party to file written statement was closed.

2. The Counsel for the Revisionist/Opposite Party submitted that a notice was issued to the Revisionist without a copy of the complaint for the appearance on 11.04.2022. Consequently, the counsel on the behalf of Revisionist appeared before the District Commission on 11.04.2022 and filed its vakalatnama. Subsequently, on the same day, the Revisionist received a copy of the complaint. Accordingly, the District Commission directed the Revisionist to file a reply to the complaint. However, it was discovered that pages 11, 15, and 22 were missing from the copy of the complaint. Therefore, on 07.07.2022, the next hearing date, the Revisionist's counsel informed the District Commission about the missing pages and requested for supply of these mission pages. However, the District Commission did not address this issue and proceeded to close the Revisionist's right to file a written statement. The counsel for the Revisionist also submitted the non filing of the written statement was DISMISSED PAGE 2 OF 5 RP - 18/2022 D.O.D.: 27.05.2024 ARSH PROPERTY EXPERTS PVT. LTD. VS. DULAN GOGOI neither deliberate nor intentional. Pressing the aforementioned submissions, the Revisionist/Opposite Party prayed for setting aside the order dated 07.07.2022 of the District Commission.

7. It is evident from the order dated 07.07.2022 that the documents on pages 15, 16, and 17 of the complaint belonged to the Revisionist. However, the Revisionist did not provide any evidence to suggest that DISMISSED PAGE 3 OF 5 RP - 18/2022 D.O.D.: 27.05.2024 ARSH PROPERTY EXPERTS PVT. LTD. VS. DULAN GOGOI these documents were not available to them. Therefore, without any supporting evidence, the submission made by the revisionist cannot be given any credence.

10. Therefore, in light of the aforesaid discussion, we find no reason to interfere with the order dated 21.09.2023 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum - II, Qutub Institutional Area in Consumer Complaint No.353/2021 titled as Dulan Gogoi vs. Arsh Property Experts Pvt. Ltd.

11. Consequently, the Revision Petition No.18/2022 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 

DISMISSED                                                                         PAGE 4 OF 5
 RP - 18/2022                                                           D.O.D.: 27.05.2024

ARSH PROPERTY EXPERTS PVT. LTD. VS. DULAN GOGOI

12. The Parties are directed to appear before District Commission on 22.07.2024.

13. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment.

14. The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

15. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

(JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL) PRESIDENT (PINKI) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Pronounced On: