Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

13. Then comes second question as to whether petitioner is entitled and has right of consideration for regularisation under Section 33-A of Act, 1982. On a bare perusal of Section 33-A of the said Act, I find it has no application to the instant case in any manner. Sub-section (1) thereof provides regularisation of teachers appointed on ad-hoc basis before the commencement of U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board (Amendment Ordinance),1985 which is not the case of petitioner.

14. Sub-Section (1-A) deals with the regularisation of ad-hoc teachers promoted on ad-hoc basis against substantive vacancy in accordance with para 2 of First Order as amended from time to time w.e.f. the date of commencement of U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Amendment Act, 1991 which came into force on 6.4.1991.

15. Sub-section (1-B) provides for regularisation of those ad-hoc teachers who have been appointed against the substantive vacancy after 12.6.1985 and before 13.5.1989. None of the aforesaid provisions apply to the case of petitioner.

16. Sub-section (1-C) talks of those teachers who have been appointed by promotion or by direct recruitment before 31.7.1988 on ad hoc basis against the substantive vacancy and for their regularisation, benefit is to be given from the date of commencement of U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Amendment Act, 1991.