Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

In reference to the court order dated 09/03/2021, Where in the HON"BLE HIGH COURT wants to know two issues/queries:-

1. Angiography test can be conducted at jail premise?
2. Under custody, facilities are available to take the accused to appropriate government hospital for angiography test, if so medically advised?

Clarification- In regards, to the two queries, My opinion is an under that the inmate patient Prabhat Kumar Srivastava was a known case of Uncontrolled type-2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, C.A.D. (coronary atery diseases) (heart diseases), history of P.T.C.A. done in 2017, Hypothyroidism with severe non proliferative diabetes retinopathy with diabetes macular edema. Inmate patient was admitted in M.I.Room of Central Jail no.07, Dispensary from 27/02/2020 to 23/03/2020 in critical condition. While at Central jail no.07, He was repeatedly sent to Safdarjung Hospital for follow up treatment of C.A.D. (Coronary Artery Diseases) (Heart diseases) and AIIMS (R.P.CENTER) for monoclonal antibodies intravitreal injection (Eye) treatment of Severe Non Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy with Diabetes Macular Edema. Considering the irreversible nature of ailments and multiple co-morbidities of the patient, he requires regular Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUMIT GHAI Signing Date:25.03.2021 17:59:15 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ ANU MALHOTRA.

32. It was also submitted on behalf of the SFIO that the factum that the applicant was being provided treatment from the jail dispensary also from 27.02.2020 to 23.03.2020 at the Safdarjung Hospital at AIIMS (R.P. CENTER) for monoclonal antibodies intravitreal injection (Eye) treatment of Severe Non Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy with Diabetes Macular Edema indicated that the petitioner could be provided adequate treatment whilst being lodged at the jail itself, in as much as he could be sent from the jail to the concerned hospitals i.e. Safdarjung Hospital and AIIMS Hospital for his catheter angiography as well as for his intravitreal injections in the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUMIT GHAI Signing Date:25.03.2021 17:59:15 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ ANU MALHOTRA.

CONCLUSION

33. On a consideration of the submissions that have been made on behalf of either side, this Court is of the considered view that the applicant cannot be considered to be a person so sick to fall within the ambit of grant of regular bail till disposal of the proceedings in the complaint case for all that he needs is the intravitreal injections and the angiography which he himself has chosen to be rescheduled after his eye injections and which angiography even as per the report of the Human Care Medical Trust would require hospitalization for a day, though the other procedure would take time depending upon the procedure required and the kidney function test.