Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

It was decided to hold the next meeting on 06.10.2006 at the same time and venue advising the claimants to file their Evidence by way of an affidavit and the Respondents to file their statement of defence/objections, if any, to controvert or to rebut the claim of the claimants. Consequently notice dated 15.09.2006 was issued to all the parties under speed post.

9. That on 06.10.2006 neither any of the Respondent or their Advocate attended nor any communication have been received from them since the notice dated 15.09.2006 sent to all the respondents as well as to their advocate under speed post have been received back as un-delivered. The Notice sent to the Respondent No. 1 & 2 have been received back with postal remarks "DID NOT MEET EVEN AFATER GOING MANY AJ TIMES - HENCE RETURN". AND THE NOTICE SENT TO THE respondent No. 3 has also been received back with postal remarks "NOT MET" whereas the notice sent to their advocate has been received back with postal remarks "INTIMATION DELIVERED - UNCLAIMED". However Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate, from M/S Sanjeev Singh & Associates, Advocates representing the claimants attended and he filed the necessary evidence by way of an affidavit duly sworn in on 14th Sept. 2006 by the authorized representative of the claimant. Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate, suggested to afford one more opportunity as the last opportunity to the respondent to file their statement of defence/objections if any by 31st October 2006 by issue of a formal notice sending therewith a photocopy of the Evidence as filed by the claimants. Consequently notice dated 10.10.2006 was duly sent to all the parties under speed post.