Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

The battle line between the group opposing the wakf board's decision and the other group supporting it is very well drawn given the strategic location of the land involved in the Government facilitated land transaction. The submissions spread over four days covered wide ranging issues with reference to Islamic Law of Wakfs, jagir land tenures and inam tenures. The core issue, however, which was focussed upon by the rival counsel is the maintainability of the writ petitions in view of the provisions of the Wakf Act entrusting the jurisdiction to resolve all disputes regarding wakfs to a specially constituted Wakf Tribunal and the provisions in the Wakf Act which expressly bars the jurisdiction of civil Courts. It is axiomatic that a Parliamentary law or a state law; a constitutional amendment included - denying judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts would be ultra vires as contravening basic structure doctrine. This is, however, not to suggest that the Court exercising judicial review power can ignore well settled judicially evolved principles which curtail the power on the ground of non-reviewability or non-justiciability besides other limitations in exercise of power.