Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. This order is in continuation of our earlier order dated 12.12.2013. Both the orders should be read together.

2. By order dated 12.12.2013 we had requested Shri Tankha, learned senior counsel to get appropriate instructions/clarification from the State Government insofar as Clause ’C’ of the affidavit dated 26.11.2013.

3. Today learned senior counsel, Shri Tankha has filed an affidavit on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh. In the said affidavit they have pleaded their inability to extend the 6th Pay Commission Scales to the Teachers/Lecturers/non-teaching staff working in private aided educational institutions in the State of Madhya Pradesh though their appointment is approved by the State Government.

4. After hearing Shri Tankha, Shri Shanti Bhushan and Dr. Rajeev Dhawan and other learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the opinion that the request of Shri Shanti Bhushan for extending the 6th Pay commission scales to the Teachers/Lecturers/non-teaching staff working in the private aided educational institutions should be accepted and granted. We are also of the view that whatever amount that is being paid pursuant to the orders passed by this court on 12.12.2013 and 07.01.2014 shall not be recovered from the Teachers/Lecturers/Non-Teaching staff working in the private aided educational institutions.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Vivek K Tankha, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. K. Shukla, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Nitin S Tambwekar, Adv.
Mr. B.S. Sai, Adv.
Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv.
Mr.Shanti Bhushan, Sr.Adv Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Rohit K Singh, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Seth, Adv. Mr. Karthik Seth, Adv. Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv.