Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Transcript certificate in Narender Singh vs Shakuntala Solanki And Anr on 28 August, 2025Matching Fragments
5. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff submitted that plaintiff is, inter alia, relying upon call recording dated 22.11.2019 and such recording, along with the transcript and certificate under Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (corresponding Section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023), are attached herewith as Annexure P-4.
6. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for petitioner, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, submits that he would not press the present petitions but prays that the abovesaid call recording, transcription and certificate may be permitted to be taken on record of Trial Court in terms of Order VII Rule 14 CPC. He submits that during the trial, he would prove the same in accordance with law.
10. In view of the above, the present petitions are disposed of as not pressed and, simultaneously, plaintiff, in terms of Order VII Rule 14 CPC, is permitted to place on record the electronic media containing call recording dated 22.11.2019, along with transcript and certificate.
11. A copy, thereof, be also provided to learned Counsel for defendants, if not already supplied.