Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: highly improbable in Vikram Kumar @ Bam vs The State Of Bihar on 8 December, 2022Matching Fragments
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is no specific allegation or overt act available against this petitioner, where admittedly, as per F.I.R., petitioner was the part of crowd only. It is submitted that prior to this occurrence, antecedent of this petitioner was clean but he was named in 2 more cases out of same protest. It is further submitted that it is highly improbable to present petitioner at three (3) different places of occurrence at same time be at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58334 of 2022(3) dt.08-12-2022 Masaudhi, Jehanabad and Patna GRP area. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is no specific allegation or overt act available against this petitioner, where admittedly, as per F.I.R., petitioner was the part of crowd only. It is submitted that prior to this occurrence, antecedent of this petitioner was clean but he was named in 2 more cases out of same protest. It is further submitted that it is highly improbable to present petitioner at three (3) different places of occurrence at same time be at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58334 of 2022(3) dt.08-12-2022 Masaudhi, Jehanabad (Taregna) and Jehanabad R.P.F. Area. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is no specific allegation or overt act available against this petitioner, where admittedly, as per F.I.R., petitioner was the part of crowd only. It is submitted that prior to this occurrence, petitioner found named in one more criminal case, where he is on bail and after this occurrence, he was named in 1 more case out of same protest. It is further submitted that it is highly improbable to present petitioner at two (2) different places of occurrence at same time be at Masaudhi, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58334 of 2022(3) dt.08-12-2022 Jehanabad. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is no specific allegation or overt act available against this petitioner, where admittedly, as per F.I.R., petitioner was the part of crowd only. It is submitted that prior to this occurrence, antecedent of this petitioner was clean but he was named in 2 more cases out of same protest. It is further submitted that it is highly improbable to present petitioner at three (3) different places of occurrence at same time be at Masaudhi, Jehanabad and Taregna RPF area. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58334 of 2022(3) dt.08-12-2022 complete for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.