Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
In or about 1895, some American Missionaries established a religious
institution (Church) at Valsad for propagation of protestant faith of Christian
religion and to establish and manage the churches for the people professing
that faith. The object of the 'Brethren Church' was to propagate the work of
the church of the brethren in western India in order to reveal Christ by
means of evangelistic, educational, medical, literary, industrial school, social
and charitable activities leading to the establishment of the kingdom of God.
A Continuation Committee is said to have been appointed in the year 1930
by the representatives of the Brethren Church and other churches in a
Round Table Conference held in New Delhi with a view to consider the
modalities and other details for amalgamation of churches. The Committee
is said to have worked out a broad basis for the unification of churches
which was accepted by the participant churches whereupon a new committee
came into being in the year 1951. The First District Church of the Brethren
in India (Brethren Church) was registered as a religious society under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 bearing Registration No.1202/44; the object
whereof was to promote the work of the church of the brethren in Western
India with the same object wherefor the church was established. Another
Round Table Conference is said to have been held in the year 1951 at New
Delhi resulting in appointment of a new committee known as 'Negotiating
Committee' in order to continue deliberations for the union of churches; five
other associations were included in the Committee, namely, The Council of
the Baptist Churches in North India, The Church of India, Pakistan, Burma
and Ceylon, The Methodist Church (British and Australian Conference),
The Methodist Church in Southern Asia and The United Church o Northern
India. The Brethren Church (First District Church of the Brethren) was
registered as a public trust in Gujarat bearing No.E-643, Bharuch in terms of
the BPT Act. The Negotiating Committee made its final recommendations
which came to be known as the '4th Plan of the Union' which was published
in a book entitled 'Plan of Church Union in North India and Pakistan'; the
principal recommendation of the Committee being that all the six uniting
churches should be dissolved and united to become one church to be known
as "The Church of Northern India" (hereinafter referred to as "the CNI)
which should be the legal continuation and successor of the united churches
and all the properties, assets, obligations etc. thereof would vest in or
devolve on CNI. The booklet of the 4th Plan is said to have been circulated
to the governing bodies of the uniting churches with a view to enable them
to deliberate thereover and to take appropriate decision in that behalf.
The records do not show that the said company had ever taken any
decision as regard control and management of the Trust and/ or had dealt
with the properties belonging to the Brethren Church.
It is also not in dispute that local churches or congregations which
desired to function on the basis of the old constitution were at liberty to do
so till the 3rd Ordinary Synod of C.N.I. which was to be held in 1977.
According to the plaintiffs, most of the churches or congregations
under the Gujarat Diocesan Council implemented the said chapter. The
church or congregation at Valsad although decided to adopt the said
constitution, but it is contended that in the intervening period the property
Committee (Property Trust Board) of the former Brethren Church continued
to manage the properties, estate, etc. of Valsad Church as an agent of and on
behalf of the Gujarat Diocesan Council.
The defendant Nos. 1 to 4 who were residents of Valsad and Navsari;
took exceptions to the decision of the Synod to terminate the interim period
with effect from 7th October, 1977 and held a meeting on 12th November,
1978.
A resolution had been adopted by the said defendants along with
others asserting that their independent unit would hold all the movable and
immovable properties, deposit in a bank and cash in hand of the church in its
properties wherefor a special committee was constituted.
The defendant Nos. 2 to 4 are said to the members of the said
committee and defendant No. 1 claims to be the Pastor of the Brethren
Church. Admittedly, a decision of the executive committee of the Gujarat
Diocesan Council taken by it at its meeting held on 11th November, 1978
was stated to be illegal by the defendant Nos. 1 to 4. It is averred:
"The defendants Nos. 1 and 2 also claim to be the
Treasurer and Secretary respectively of the said
"Valsad Brethren Church". These dissidents are
acting in the name of the former Brethren Church
and have been writing letters as office bearers of
former Brethren Church to the Valsad District
Co-operative Bank, the Ankleshwar Branch of
the Broach District Central Co-operative Bank
etc., asking them not to deal with the members of
the legally constituted Pastorate committee of
Ankleshwar and Valsad and asserting that they
are the only persons legally entitled to deal with
the financial affairs of the Ankleshwar and
Valsad Pastorates. Besides, defendant No. 2,
styling as a secretary of Brethren Church has
complained to the authorities that the 20 local
Pastorates under the Gujarat Diocesan Council
do not function in the name of Brethren Church
and do not collect funds in the name of the
Brethren Church. A similar complaint was made
by him to the Assistant Charity Commissioner
Broach who had the matter inquired into. The
defendant No. 2, again, purporting to act as a
Secretary of the Valsad Brethren Church, wrote a
letter on 20th June, 1979 to the legally elected
Treasurer of the Ankleshwar church challenging
the latter's authority to act as such Treasurer.