Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

20. The aforesaid facts/details as also a perusal of 'the 2009 Act' would clearly answer to the original question Patna High Court CWJC No.17154 of 2022 dt.01-04-2024 that was incorporated in the first paragraph of the writ petition. This Court thus holds that the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bikramganj Rohtas definitely travelled beyond Section 4 of 'the 2009 Act' in passing the order in question and in that circumstances, the same needs interference.

21. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 submits that he may be given liberty to approach the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. The said liberty is always available to the aggrieved person(s) much less the petitioner herein.

22. The order dated 04.11.2022 passed in Land Dispute Case No. 30/2022-23 by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bikramganj, Rohtas stands quashed.