Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, applicant has preferred the Criminal Appeal before the Additional Session Judge, Indore but the same was dismissed by the impugned judgment and order of compensation passed by the trial Court, hence, this revision has been preferred by the applicant.

4. Applicant has preferred this revision that he made a written complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Indore on 23.12.2023 regarding fraud committed with him then he has also filed the private complaint before the Court. He has also given the reply of notice to the complainant. There is material contention in the statement of Murnidhar Katariya (PW-1). The trial Court has not considered the statement of Gendalal (PW-1). The applicant/accused has deposited the entire amount in question by way of cheque. The bank and vendors has a conspiracy against him. Applicant is suffering from heart disease and paralysis, hence, he prays that the impugned judgment passed by both the Courts below be set aside and applicant be acquitted from all the charges.

10. So far the sentence of applicant is concerned, he has filed so many documents regarding prolong treatment of heart and paralysis. Applicant is 65 years old person and suffered from medical ailment. During the pendency of this appeal he has already suffered jail incarceration of 10 days. Applicant has filed several money receipt and from perusal of the said receipt it is proved that the applicant has deposited the entire amount in question before the trial Court. Therefore, looking to the old age and medical ailment of the applicant, it would be appropriate to reduce the jail sentence awarded to him.