Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: GODDA in Lakhindra Mirdha vs (1) The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2020Matching Fragments
Lakhindra Mirdha, Son of Late Sukdeo Mirdha @ Sukud Mirdha, Resident of village-Gangta (Khurd), P.O&P.S.-Godda (T), District-Godda ... Petitioner Versus (1) The State of Jharkhand (2) Kusum Devi, Wife of Lakhinder Mirdha, Resident of village- Gangta (Khurd), P.O-Godda, P.S.-Godda(T), District-Godda, present address Village-Mahara, PS- Poraiyahat, District-Godda (3) Priyanka Kumari (aged about 8 years), D/o Lakhinder Mirdha, Resident of village-Gangta (Khurd), P.O&P.S.-Godda (T), District- Godda (4) Suraj Kumar Mirdha (aged about 6 years), son of Lakhinder Mirdha (5) Priya Kumari (aged about 4 years), D/o Lakhinder Mirdha (6) Ladli Kumari (aged about 1 year), D/o Lakhinder Mirdha Petitioner no.1 is the natural Guardian of Petitioner nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 and residents of Petitioner Nos.3 to 6 are village- Mahara, PO-Poraiyahat, PS-Poraiyahat, District-Godda ... Opposite Parties
8. In view of the aforesaid discussions, I am of the opinion that the amount of maintenance fixed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda is just, proper and reasonable and it does not warrant interference by this Court.
9. Accordingly, Criminal Revision No. 73 of 2016 is dismissed.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) R.K.