Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: BLS in Mars Bottlers Una Private Limited vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 23 September, 2025Matching Fragments
14. As per Report, on inspection of spirit storage all the VATS, bottles stock and the stock, were physically checked, details whereof are as under:
Spirit VAT S. Spirit VAT Quantity as per Quantity as per Difference No. physical record (In Bls) verification 1 SSV-I 19205 Bls 19929.82 Bls -724.82 2 SSV-II 15873 Bls 15890 Bls -17 Blending VAT S. Blending VAT Quantity as per Quantity as per Difference No. physical record (In Bls) verification 1 BSSV-I IMFL 12231 Bls 12234.96 Bls +3.96 2 BSSV-II IMFL 1926 Bls 1926.46 Bls +0.46 3 BSSV-I CL 6372 Bls 6383.46 Bls +11,46 4 BSSV-II CL - - -
Bottled stock and Stock S. Name of Stock a per stock register Stock as per physical verification Diffe No Brand Quarts Pints Nips BLs Quarts Pints Nips BLs renc (in (in (in (in (in (in e (In cases) cases) cases) cases) cases) cases) Bls)
1. Himachali 201 203 402 7254 200 200 400 7200 -54 Santra
3) Difference in quantity in SSV-I (Spirit) (-724.82 Bls), in SSV-II (Spirit) (-17 Bls) and variation in degree of (-3.1) as per hydrometer reading in SSV-II.
4) Difference in stock in BSSV-I IMFL (Blending VAT) (+3.96 Bls), BSSV-II IMFL (+0.46 Bls), BSSV-I CL (+11.46 Bls) and variation in strength in BSSV-I IMFL (6.9), BSSV-II IMFL (6.7) and BSSV-I CL (0.3).
5) Variation in strength of Holding Tank golden Tiger, Holding Tan Rum and Holding Tank Himachal Santra.
6) Variation as per D13B and physical stock in Holding Tank Himachal Santra is 450 Bls.
7) Variation in bottled Stock in Himachali Santra (-54 Bls), Himalyan Monk rum (-27 Bls) and golden Tiger (?Export) (+183.24 Bls).
8) CCTV Cameras of the plant was not functional.
17. In reply to the notice, dated 22.3.2024 (Annexure P-4), the petitioner submitted that though Vehicle HR-39D-8993 was parked in bottling plant but there was no liquor loaded in it and full responsibility for Points No.3 to 8 was taken on behalf of petitioner with request to take a lenient action and impose minimum penalty while deciding the case, on the ground that there were some violations which have been committed by the employees at the plant and has assured that the violations shall not be repeated again.