Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

50.The grante of the inam was Rengaier. He had a son Singaperumal Iyer. Singaperumal Iyer had two sons, S.Rengaiyer and S.Thirupuli Krishnaiyer. Both of them orally partitioned the 3.20 acres into eastern and western halfs. The eastern half measured 1.60 acres and the western half also measured 1.60 acres. S.Rengaiyer was allotted the eastern half and S.Thirupuli Krishnaiyer was allotted the western half. S.Rengaiyer had three sons, R.Ponnadi, Thirumalirunsolai and Chinna Krishnaiyer. S.Thirupuli Krishnaiyer had two sons, T.Sundarajaiyer and T.Chenna Krishnaiyer. http://www.judis.nic.in

52.A reading of Ex.A1 reveals that the schedule mentioned property in the sale deed namely 1.60 acres on the eastern half in S.No.395/2 was already sold to the plaintiff and the sale deed was only a document reducing in writing such sale. It is also seen that Rengaier had leased out the property. He also created a mortgage with right to possess to Pappathiammal, on 17.05.1943. In the sale deed, it was stated that the plaintiff should redeem the mortgage. The entire land was sold for a total consideration of Rs.1,000/-;. S.Rengaiyer, similarly sold 80 cents on the north western half of Survey No.395/2 by Ex.A2 to C.Govindan. Those lands were also mortgaged by Pappathiammal. The total consideration was Rs.5,00/-. Again on 18.05.1959, T.Chenna Krishnaiyer, sold the remaining 80 cents on the western half to C.Govindan, for a total consideration of Rs.500/- Again, the said property had also been mortgaged with right to possess in favour of Pappathiammal.