Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. The Criminal Application is admitted and heard finally by the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Undisputedly, Mr.Ram Karode, learned Counsel appears for the respondent no.2 on the basis of Vakalatnama executed by her. Today, an affidavit dt.23.1.2018 is filed by the respondent no.2 through another Counsel Ms Sonali B. Khobragade. However, no 3 apl780.17.odt objection from Mr.Ram Karode has not been obtained for engaging another Counsel and this is what the grievance made before this Court. Mr.Ram Karode, learned Counsel does not have any objection if he is discharged from the proceedings. We asked a specific question to the respondent no.2, who is personally present before the Court and identified by Learned Counsels Mr.Ram Karode as well as Ms Khobragade as to whether she wanted to continue Mr.Ram Karode. She submits that she has no objection for discharge of Mr.Ram Karode as her Counsel. Hence, Mr.Ram Karode, learned Counsel is discharged.