Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:-

"i) That Policy dated 16.7.2020 (Annexure P-1) may kindly be quashed to the extent it provides for registration of sale deed before issuance of selection process/advertisement.
ii) That the respondents be directed to award 08 marks to the petitioner in the interview held on 22.6.2022 for the post of part time Multi Task Worker in Government Primary School timba Kando, Educatin Block Sangrah, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh more particularly in view of explanation/clarification given in communication dated 24.5.2022.
iii) That the respondents may be directed to re-

draw the selection list for the post of part time Multi Task Worker in Government Primary School Timba Kando, Education Block Sangrah, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh after awarding 08 marks to the petitioner for land donated by her family, as per Clause 7 of .

Annexure P-1 and thereafter declare the result of the post."

2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that this petition is liable to be disposed of in terms of the order dated 15.06.2022, passed in CWP No.3728 of 2022, titled Smt. Bhawani Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. The operative part of the said order reads as under:-

"5. Some clarifications were sought on different issues by various quarters with regard to the allocation of marks and validity of various certificates/documents, etc. In this regard, the impugned clarification was issued on 24th May, 2022. A perusal of the said clarification reveals that a Committee had been constituted to examine the issues raised during recruitment process for engagement of part time multi task workers. On the basis of the recommendation of the Committee a clarification was issued on 24th May, 2022. A perusal of the clarification No.4 reveals that term 'family' will be "land owner or his/her spouse or children". The said clarification has been issued by the respondents with a view to achieve the purpose of the scheme. This Court while exercising extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot interfere in the meaning given by the respondents vis-à-vis term 'family'. As .