Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

On the basis of S.7 it is contended by the counsel for State that no aid can be claimed as a matter of right. It is for the government to decide not only whether the grant-in-aid is to be given to recognised institution but also as to how much and under what heads the grant is to be sanctioned to the NGEIs. In counter it is submitted by the counsel for petitioners that once educational institution is registered, it is entitled to grant-in-aid from government as a matter of right and for this proposition reliance was placed on the decision of State of Maharashtra v. Manubhai Pragaji Vashi, (1995) 5 SCC 730. This case, in our opinion, does not assist the petitioners in contending that they are entitled as a matter of right to get the grant-in-aid to the recognised private law colleges while the same was extended to other faculties of the private colleges. The court emphasised upon the necessity of giving legal education and to fulfill the obligation under Article 39A of the Constitution of providing free legal aid and held that the faculty of law in the matter of considering grant-in-aid run by private recognised colleges cannot be discriminated on the ground of being a professional course falling upon the economic resources. The court emphasising upon the necessity of maintaining status of legal education held that these aspects necessarily flowing from Articles 21 and 39A of the Constitution were totally lost sight of by the Government when it denied the grant-in-aid to the recognised private law colleges as was afforded to other faculties. The State has abdicated the duty enjoined on it by the relevant provisions of the Constitution of aforesaid. Accordingly, the Court directed the Government to extend grant-in-aid scheme to Govt. recognised private law colleges on the same criteria on which such grant were given to other faculties viz., Arts, Science, Commerce, Engineering and Medicine from the Academic Year 1995.