Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: phone interception in Pranjal Sharma vs Central Bureau Of Investigation (Cbi) ... on 14 May, 2026Matching Fragments
3.3. It is alleged and charged that Nirmalendu Saha was about to retire on 31.12.2025 and he demanded an undue gratification of Rs. 3,43,000/- as reward from co-accused Pranjal Sharma for favouring him with allocation of multiple orders. The place where the undue gratification was to be handed over was a guest house in the Guwahati University campus.
3.4 It is also alleged and charged that due to his nefarious activities Pranjal Sharma was always under surveillance of the CBI and his phone was intercepted.
6. It is further contended that CBI has also admitted about the relationship Page No.# 7/12 between both the petitioners. They are close acquaintances and charge sheet at paragraph 16.6. also reflects that petitioner Nirmalendu Saha was acquainted to Pranjal Sharma. The conversations over phone, intercepted by the investigating agency are nothing but conversations between two family friends. The CBI has misinterpreted certain conversations between the petitioners to be conversations dealing in undue gratification between both the accused petitioners.