Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Supriya Debey vs Amar Nath Sadhu & Ors on 6 November, 2024Matching Fragments
3. The present revisional application has been preferred against an order no.41 dated 09.01.2024 passed by the learned Judge 7th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Misc. Case No. 587 of 2021 arising out of Ejectment Execution case No. 63 of 2016 (Amar Nath Sadhu .Vs. Smt. Arati Dutta).
2
4. It is the case of the petitioner that she has received an application under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code read with Rule 208 of Civil Rules and Orders filed by the opposite parties.
5. In paragraph 1 of the said application reference has been made to an Ejectment Suit No. 3 of 2012 of the learned trial Court as well as judgment and decree passed in the said suit as well as ejectment execution case no. 63 of 2016.
6. Petitioner states that she has no knowledge of the proceedings as she was not a party in the said case. As such the petitioner filed an application before the Trial Court praying for direction upon the decree holders to serve copies of relevant documents in connection with Ejectment Suit no. 3 of 2012 and other relevant documents.