Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. The respondents further submitted that based on the report of the Automobile Engineer and on the strength of the statements given by Thiru S.Ramasubbu, Foreman and Driver PC-972 Saravanan, the petitioner was placed under suspension by the second respondent in Range Office No.103/2002 dated 17.09.2003 in C.NO.D2/17672/2003. A charge memo was framed against the petitioner under Rule 17(b) of the said Rules. It was served on the petitioner on 13.10.2003. The petitioner submitted his written explanation on 21.10.2003.