Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Please NOTE, there were no female guards or any woman called for this (despite female guards standing right outside). The VC exited and while he was exiting, both the Rector and R. Pawar pushed me holding my arm and pushing me against my chest with their hand. The VC, Rector could have simply asked me to move or stand aside, except all 3 men used their physically farce (sic) on me.‖ 3.3 The aforesaid claim was lodged with the Gender Sensitization Committee against Sexual Harassment (hereafter ‗GSCASH') of the University.

W.P.(C) 7915/2018 Page 3 of 14

3.4 Thereafter, on 01.03.2017, the petitioner addressed an e-mail to the three persons who had allegedly subjected her to sexual harassment

-Mr Jagadesh Kumar, Mr Chintamani Mahapatra and Mr Ramesh Pawar.

3.5 The petitioner deposed before the GSCASH Inquiry Committee on 06.03.2017.

3.6 The petitioner states that on 26.07.2017 she was called for two Proctorial inquiries on charges of indiscipline, which she claims are false. She has also made a grievance of the said inquiry proceedings being video recorded against her consent.

3.12 The ICC was constituted and GSCASH was replaced by the said ICC at the 269th Council meeting of the University held on 18.09.2017. It is stated that the office of the GSCASH was locked in the evening of 18.09.2017 by the University administration.

3.13 The petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 17.10.2017 by the Chief Proctor office alleging misconduct on her part. The petitioner claims that the details of the sexual harassment incident of 28.02.2017 were discussed during the proctorial inquiry, which caused great mental and emotional stress to the petitioner.