Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

// 3 // 4.1. It is contended that vide another office order issued on 29.06.2010 under Annexure-2 by Opposite Party No.3, appointment of the Petitioner was approved against a TGT post, so made by the Managing Committee of Jhadeswar Bidya pitha, Khanua w.e.f. 29.06.2010, but in the untrained scale of pay. 4.2. It is contended that while so continuing as against a TGT post with receipt of untrained salary, Petitioner when acquired the B.Ed. qualification from IGNOU, the result of which was published on 10.03.2014, Opposite Party No.3 was moved by Opposite Party No.4 with a request to grant trained graduate scale of pay in favour of the Petitioner, vide letter dtd.29.04.2014 under Annexure-3-Series.

// 19 // 5.12. It is also contended that claim of the Petitioner to get the benefit of trained graduate scale of pay on his acquiring B.Ed. qualification from IGNOU, the result of which was published on 10.03.2014, since has been rejected by Opposite Party No.3 in consideration of the proposal submitted under Annexure-3, Petitioner is not eligible to get the benefit of trained scale w.e.f. 10.03.2014 as prayed for. The stand taken in Para-15 of the counter affidavit reads as follows:-