Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

During investigation, statement of Anurag Gupta was recorded by the IO in the hand writing of Anurag Gupta on 24.02.2009. The transcript of the recorded conversation were prepared. Voice samples of the accused persons and Deepak Aggarwal were collected and sent to FSL for comparison, with the recorded conversation. The reports were positive. However, Anurag Gupta was not available for his voice sample and, therefore, no FSL report could be collected for the same. IO also recorded the statement of one Amit Kumar Kashyap, who had accompanied Deepak Aggarwal on 08.01.2009. Deepak Aggarwal had video recorded the meeting with SI R.K.Tyagi.

4.3 ACP Data Ram (PW­24) deposed that both the accused persons had worked under his control. He was then working as ACP Seelampur. He identified the voices of both the accused persons in CD Ex. P­2. He also identified the picture of accused Ram Kumar Tyagi in the video footage of CD Ex. P­2. He proved the observation memo Ex. PW4/A which was prepared during investigation for the same purpose. 4.4 Dr. C.P. Singh (PW­5) proved FSL report Ex. PW5/A, wherein he had given his opinion that the audio track dated 8.1.2009 and 12.02.2009 contained in the CD Ex. P­2 examined by him indicated no alteration in audio recordings. He also opined the voices contained therein to be matching with the sample voices of accused persons. V Laxmi Narasimha (PW­9) had also analysed the audio track contained in CD Ex. P­2. He proved his report Ex. PW9/A wherein he had opined voice of complainant Deepak Aggarwal in audio track of 8.1.2009 to match with the admitted voice of Deepak Aggarwal. 4.5 H.C. Anand Prakash (PW­1), Ct. Jatinder Singh (PW­2) and HC Chandra Singh (PW­10) proved the link evidence of video CD being carried from malkhana to FSL. They proved the sanctity of pulanda during its journey from malkhana to FSL. HC Jitinder Singh (PW­3) and HC Jai Prakash (PW­4) remained as malkhana Incharge of PS Civil Line, where CD containing recorded conversation (Ex. P­2) and voice sample had remained deposited. They proved the sanctity of case property.

4.6 Vijay Singh (PW­13) was a panch witness to taking of voice sample of accused S.P. Rawat. Rajesh Kumar S/o Late Sh. Ashok Kumar (PW­14) was a panch witness to taking of voice sample of complainant Deepak Aggarwal. Rajesh Kumar, Inspector T&TE (PW­19) and Sh. Pankaj Verma (PW­23) were panch witnesses to the recording of voice sample of accused Ram Kumar Tyagi. Kuldeep Kumar ( PW­17) and Siya Ram Meena (PW­18) are panch witnesses to the proceeding dated 20.02.2009 when Inspector Yash Pal Singh (PW­22) and ACP K.R. Meena had brought the accused Ram Kumar Tyagi and S.P. Rawat respectively to PS ACB. Audio CDs containing recorded conversations were played before them and both the accused persons, then arrested. Maharaj Mandal (PW­16) was a panch witness to preparation of transcript of conversation dated 08.01.2009. He proved transcript Ex. PW16/A to have been prepared in his presence. Inspector Avinash Sharma, part IO, proved transcript of conversation dated 12.02.2009(Ex.PW26/G), to have been correctly prepared by him. 4.7 Ct. Mukesh (PW­7) of PS Bhajanpura proved duty roaster of PS Bhajanpura for 8.01.2009 indicating presence of accused R.K. Tyagi at the PS for 'day emergency' duty. Tirath Ram (PW­6) is a panch witness to handing over of duty roaster by Ct. Mukesh. 4.8 Satish Chander (PW­8) proved grant of sanction to prosecute accused S.P. Rawat. Rajiv Ranjan (PW­15), DCP proved grant of sanction to prosecute accused SI R.K. Tyagi.