Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: amphetamine in Ncb vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh And Anr on 29 July, 2017Matching Fragments
(c) The parcel Airway bill no. 466420580086 was produced by Manager Sh. Punit Sharma. On examination the parcel in the form of cardboard box was found containing five executive synthetic fiber bags. The parcel was attached with invoice performa and the Airway bill booked by Ramesh Bhai, 15 ground floor, Gold Souk Complex, CG Road, Ahmedabad, Gujrat and was destined to consignee Sh. Ganeshan, No. AGF08, Pongsapuri, Lakshmana Jaya, A. Kampung Lakshmana, Batu Caves, Selangor Darulehsan68100, Malaysia. The said parcel was closely inspected and cavities were found in stitched NCB Vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr inner layer of bags which were found containing white powder substance. On testing the same with testing kit it gave positive result for Amphetamine. Since the texture and colour of all the substance were similar, it was transferred into a transparent polythene bag which was weighing about 2.4 kg. Two samples of 5 gm each were taken from the said substance and were put in zip lock packets. The samples were further wrapped in paper envelope and were marked as A1, A2. The packing material containing the card board box with five synthetic executive fiber bags were packed in a white cloth which was marked as B. All the parcels and samples were duly sealed with paper slips having dated signature of IO, both witnesses namely Sh. Gulshan Kaushik and Sh. Puneet Sharma, and were sealed with the seal of Narcotic Control Bureau DZU5.
(e) On 22.03.2011, Sh. Y.R. Yadav sent sample A1 for chemical examination along with test memos to CRCL, New Delhi. On 02.06.2011 report was received from CRCL which confirmed positive test for Amphetamine.
(f) On 24.03.2011, Superintendent Sh. Pankaj Kumar Dwivedi sent the shipper's address to Ahmedabad Zonal Office for verification. DZU received reply vide letter dated 25.03.2011 submitting that on the said address one courier office was situated in the name of Trackon Courier Pvt Ltd, which was run by Sh. Sagar Iyer and no person by the name of Ramesh Bhai was found at the given address. Thereafter vide letter dated 29.03.2011, addressed to Superintendent, Ahmedabad, Sh. Y.R. Yadav sought details of Sagar Iyer and further asked him to find out from Sh. Sagar Iyer about the shipment and shipper of concerned parcel. Sh. P.N. Sarvaiya, Superintendent NCB of Ahmedabad Zonal Unit (AZU) NCB Vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr vide its letter dated 05.04.2011 replied that the enquiries conducted with regard to the seized parcel revealed that one Nitesh Patel of Patel Courier had handed over this shipment to Indo Express Courier Service owned by Sagar Iyer for sending it to Malaysia. Nitesh had collected the said shipment from another courier company of Ahmedabad namely Patel On Board Courier (POBC) where the shipment had arrived from Chennai. It was further revealed that Nitesh Patel was given the contract to receive the shipment which was dispatched by one Rafique Shaikh of M.R. Express Courier, Mumbai, whose address was K104, Hanjar Nagar, Opposite Aghadi Nagar, Pump House Andheri (East), Mumbai. It was further revealed that with regard to the shipment, Nitesh Patel received a copy of the document i.e. Airway bill from Konnection Express Courier and Cargo, Royal Villah Room no. 15, 3rd floor, 27/69, Venkatesh Street, Chintadripet, Chennai.
29. PW20 Sh. Y.R. Yadav, was posted as Superintendent NCB DZU on 21.03.2011. He deposed NCB Vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr that PW1 IO Mehak Jain, put a secret information before him that one parcel was lying at Fedex which is suspected to contain narcotic drugs. He directed her to constitute a team, issued seal of NCB DZU and made relevant entry at seal movement register exhibited as Ex.PW20/A with relevant entry at point X1. Lateron on the same day IO Mehak Jain submitted seizure report Ex.PW1/F u/s 57 NDPS Act regarding seizure of 2.4 kg of Amphetamine. On 25.03.2011 he received a letter from Superintendent Ahmedabad regarding verification of address of Ramesh Bhai along with visiting card of one Sagar Iyer. On 29.03.2011 he wrote letter Ex.PW20/B to Superintendent Ahmedabad sent through fax receipt Ex.PW20/C. On 05.04.2011 he received a detailed inquiry report Ex.PW6/C from Superintendent Ahmedabad. On 06.04.2011 he sent a letter Ex.PW20/D to Zonal Director, Mumbai for verification of address of Rafiq Shaikh through fax with receipt Ex.PW20/E. In the said letter he also requested to verify the antecedents of Rafiq Shaikh. On 07.04.2011 he again sent a letter Ex.PW20/F to Zonal Director, Mumbai giving details of seizure of 2.4 kg of Amphetamine through fax. On 06.06.2011 IO Mehak NCB Vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr Jain put a further secret information Ex.PW1/I before him about availability of accused Rafiq Sheik at Hotel Millennium. He issued search authorization Ex.PW14/1 in favour of IO Rajesh Kumr and seal of NCB DZU and made relevant entry in seal movement register Ex.PW20/A. IO Rajesh Kumar submitted his report Ex.PW15/4 at the back of search authorization and also returned seal to him. On 07.06.2011 he received a report Ex.PW2/B from CRCL of sample Mark A1 in respect of Amphetamine. He marked the same to IO Mehak Jain and remnant sample to IO Malkhana. On the same day IO Mehak Jain also submitted report u/s 57 NDPS Act regarding arrest of accused Rafiq Shaikh. On 08.06.2011 IO Mehak Jain also submitted another secret information about the parcel lying at Dart Air Services. He again directed constitution of team and issued search authorization. After coming back from the said courier office IO Mehak Jain returned the seal to him and put seizure report Ex.PW1/W of 1 kg of ephedrine. He sent sample mark A1 along with test memo to CRCL through driver PW11 Malkeet Singh and collected receipt after the sample being deposited by him to CRCL. Thereafter NCB Vs Rafiq Ahmed Shaikh and Anr he received another report Ex.PW2/D along with remnant samples from CRCL. On 01.07.2011, he wrote a letter to Superintendent, NCB Chennai through fax regarding verification of address of S.K. International. He received reply from the Superintendent Chennai, on 05.07.2011 and also received one visiting card along with report. Report is Ex.PW20/L and the visiting card is Ex.PW20/M. Exhibition of these two documents by this witness was objected to by learned counsel for accused.
(b) Cr.PC.: From the arguments of learned counsels for parties, following points for determination emerge :
1. Whether the prosecution is able to prove link evidence to prove conspiracy between both the accused persons for first charge related to recovery of 2.4 kg of Amphetamine from Fedex Express Services, Mayapuri?
2. Whether either of accused is guilty for any offence related to aforesaid recovery of Amphetamine?