Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

14) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that during the aforesaid period and place, accused Nos.1 to 3 take part in and abetted to commit unlawful activity i.e., to blast vital installations and to commit murder of Hindu Activists and thereby committed the offence punishable S.C.No.297/2013 under S.13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ?

15) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that during the aforesaid period and place, accused Nos.1 to 3 committed terrorist acts with an intention to threaten the unity, integrity, security of India and with an intention to strike terror in the people of India and thereby committed the offence punishable under section 16 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967?

16) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that during the aforesaid period and place, accused No.1 raised fund from accused No.2 and 3 and accused No.2 and 3 provided fund to accused No.1 through their associates to commit terrorist acts and thereby committed the offence punishable under section 17 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967?

17) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that during the aforesaid period and place, accused Nos.1 to 3 conspired together to commit the terrorist act and committed preparatory acts to commit a terrorist act by way of collecting the arms, ammunition and other explosive substances to commit the terrorist act and thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

18) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that during the aforesaid period, and place, accused Nos.1 to 3, recruited the persons for commission of terrorist act and thereby committed the offence punishable under section 18-B of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967?

19) What order?

S.C.No.297/2013

10. Findings of this Court to the above points are as follows:-