Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

S.Thankappan vs State Of Kerala on 23 January, 1996

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN

         THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/24TH JYAISHTA 1934

                      WP(C).No. 13876 of 2012 (H)
                      ---------------------------

PETITIONERS:
-------------

     1.  S.THANKAPPAN, AGED 66 YEARS
         S/O. SANKARAN, CHAKKANTHARA HOUSE, AROOR.P.O.
         ALAPUZHA.

     2.  JACOB XAVIER, AGED 62 YEARS
         KANDATHIL HOSE, P.D. ROAD, PALLURUTHY
         KOCHI-6.

     3.  M. MOHANACHANDRAN, AGED 62 YEARS
         S/O. MADHAVAN PILLAI, S.M. BHVAN, THETTIKUZHI
         NEAR KUNNATHUKUZHI, KUDAPPANAKUNNU.P.O.
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

     4.  STEPHEN LUIS, AGED 58 YEARS
         CHERUPUNATHIL HOSUE, THEVARA, KOCHI-13
         NOW RESIDING AT MOOLEPARAMBIL PONNARIMANGALAM
         MULAVUKADU.

         BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE

RESPONDENTS:
--------------

     1.  STATE OF KERALA
         REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FISHERIES AND
          PORTS DEPARTMENT
         GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

     2.  THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION FOR
           FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT LTD.,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGIGN DIRECTOR, MATSYAFED
         KAMALESWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695009.

     3.  THE GENERAL MANAGER
         KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION FOR FISHERIES
           DEVELOPMENT LTD. (MATSYAFED) KAMALESWARAM
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695009.

     4.  THE DISTRICT MANAGER
         MATSYAFED DISTRICT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM-682001.

         BY  GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI. G.GOPAKUMAR
         BY  SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC,MATSYAFED

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                              APPENDIX




 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS

EXT.P1     TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP. 11435/1991 DATED 23-1-1996
OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT.

EXT.P2     TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. 927/1996 DATED 26-10-2005
OF THE HON'BLE COURT.

EXT.P3     TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (MS) 12/2007/G & PD DATED 22-3-2007.

EXT.P4     TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (MS 13/2007/F &PD DATED 29-3-2007.

EXT.P5     TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. M'FED F2/3257/2000 DATED 25-5-
2007.

EXT.P6     TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26-8-2009 IN WPC 19110/2207
OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXT.P7     TRUE COPY OF THE TERMINATION ORDER DATED 11-4-2005.

EXT.P8     TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17-1-2011.

EXT.P8A    TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.

EXT.P9     TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER LETTER.

 EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER DATED 20-3-2011.



 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL



JJ                           /TRUE COPY/


                                               P.S.TO JUDGE



                          K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
                ------------------------------------------------------------
                       W.P(C) NO: 13876 OF 2012
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                   Dated this the 14th June, 2012.

                                    JUDGMENT

The complaint of the petitioners is that though they had submitted Ext.P8 representation to the second respondent and followed up the same with Ext.P9 reminder, no action has been taken on their representation so far. The only relief sought for is a direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P8.

2. I have heard Adv. George Poonthottam who appears for the second respondent also.

3. In view of the limited relief that is sought, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition directing Ext.P8 to be considered.

4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners, Ext.P8 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this WPC 13876/2012 2 judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to one of the petitioners.

Sd/-

                                        K. SURENDRA MOHAN
                                                Judge
jj                       /True copy/


                                             P.S.to Judge