Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Heard Sri V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri V.Rohith, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Kusuru Satyanarayana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.6 to 13.

2. W.P.No.12131 of 2024 is filed challenging the order passed by the respondent No.3 i.e, Additional Collector, Revenue (FAC), Ranga Reddy District in Case No.F1/5731/2016 dated 30.05.2023 remanding the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar by setting aside the Occupancy Rights Certificate issued in favour of the petitioners' father i.e., Balsetty Chinnaiah vide D.Dis.No.IA/5418/78 dated 26.01.1981 under Section 24 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short "the Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 ).

KL,J W.P.Nos.12131 and 15971 of 2024

3. W.P.No.15971 of 2024 is filed challenging the order passed by the respondent No.3 i.e, Additional Collector, Revenue (FAC), Ranga Reddy District in Case No.F1/5745/2016 dated 30.05.2023 remanding the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar by setting aside the Occupancy Rights Certificate issued in favour of the petitioners vide file No.K/613/91 dated 30.03.1991 under Section 24 of the Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 .

b) The said land in Sy.No.548 was assigned more than 100 new survey numbers. The petitioners are claiming right over the land admeasuring Ac.3.00 guntas in Sy.No.100 and Ac.9.11 guntas in Sy.No.101 of Nandigama Village. The father of the petitioners was in physical possession and enjoyment of the said land and as such, his name was also duly recorded in the revenue records. In proof of the same, they have filed copies of pahanies for the years 1973-74, form-I of old ROR. Respondent Nos.6 to 13 filed a suit vide O.S.No.34 of 2004 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Shadnagar for declaration to declare them as absolute owners of land admeasuring Ac.7.21 guntas out of 10.24 guntas in Sy.No.100 and also for recovery of possession.

52. As discussed supra, feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2012 in O.S.No.34 of 2004 passed by learned Junior Civil Judge, Shadnagar, unofficial respondents preferred an appeal vide A.S.No.7 of 2019 and the same pending on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Shadnagar. At the cost of reputation, it is relevant to note that unofficial respondents filed the aforesaid suit vide O.S.No.34 of 2004 against the petitioners herein seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession. The same was dismissed on 31.12.2012. They have preferred the aforesaid appeal and they have to wait for the outcome of the said appeal.