Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. Learned A.G.A. informs that he has procured complete instructions in the matter including up-to-date case diary and the investigation of the case is still going on.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The instant application has been moved by the applicant- Pappu Alias Mitrasen Yadav in F.I.R/Case Crime No. 108 of 2023, under Section 307 and 34 I.P.C., Police Station Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar, with the prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, as he is apprehending arrest in the above-mentioned case.

10. Thus, having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra : (2011) 1 SCC 694, Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) 5 SCC 1 and in Nathu Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others':(2021)6 SCC 64, liberty of the applicant may also be protected.

11. In result, the instant anticipatory bail application moved by the applicant- Pappu Alias Mitrasen Yadav is allowed and it is provided that in the event of arrest of the applicant under any process of the trial court or on his appearance before trial court within 20 days from today i.e. till 05.03.2024, whichever is earlier, he shall be released forthwith on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the S.H.O. concerned/Investigating/Arresting officer/Trial Court, subject to the following conditions: