Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: habitual absentee in Durga Prasad (05/Rb) (Constable) vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 13 September, 2002Matching Fragments
--
--
Leave without pay 17.5.94
--
--
Leave without pay 8.12.96 Pay reduced by two stages permanently.
27.11.95
--
--
Pay reduced by two (absence/overstay ) stages permanently 11.1.93 Leave without pay It shows that const. Durga Prasad No. 05/RB is a habitual absentee and an incorrigible type of police personnel which renders him liable to be 'dealt with departmentally under the provisions of Delhi Police (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 1980."
9. The Enquiry Officer in his report observed:-
"Keeping in view to the above mentioned discussion of evidence as well as material on records the undersigned reached on the conclusion that Sh. Durga Prasad, No. 5/RB (PIS No. 2885-342) is a habitual absentee. He became absent from Govt. duties unauthorisedly without any valid reason whenever he wants to do so. Even the Major punishment like four stage deduction in his pay permanently failed to change in his attitude at all. The charge is fully proved on the defaulter Const. Durga Prasad, No. 5/RD. He violated the S.O. No. 111. So, I prove him guilty."
Punishment Drill 9.10.93
--
---
Sanctioned L.R.D. 11.4.93
--
---
Sanctioned E.L. 3.3.95
---
--
Leave without pay 17.5.94
--
--
Leave without pay 8.12.96 Pay reduce by two stages permanently.
27.11.95
--
--
Pay reduce by two stages permanently.
(absence/overstay) 11.1.93 Leave without pay It shows that he is a habitual absentee and an incorrigible type of police personal.
11. The appellate authority also in his order dated 02.07.1999 considered the question in the following terms:-
"His other plea that his previous absences have wrongly been taken into consideration also does not hold any ground. His previous record has been taken into account only to prove that he is a habitual absentee. He absented himself previously on 8 different occasions for a total period of 947 days for which he was awarded 2 major punishment and minor punishments on different occasions. It speaks of his callousness, incorrigibility and casual attitude and renders him unbecoming of a member of the discipline force. His previous absents shows that he is a habitual absentee and that he did not mend himself. Despite of 2 minor punishments.