Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

21.6. It was contended that despite the substantial increase in project cost in all the projects, the learned Arbitral Tribunal erroneously rejected the Appellant‟s claim for enhancement of consultancy fee by relying upon Clause 22(q)(iv) of the Contract Agreements. According to the Appellant, the said clause merely provided for a limited compensation of 0.10% of the value of risk and cost contracts for certain specified services, such as preparation of risk and cost tender documents, drafting of advertisements, evaluation of tenders and recommendation of contractors, and was confined only to the additional work connected with processing of such tenders.