Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: maggots in Fir No. 282/14 5 State vs Tinku Singh Etc. 1 Of 82 on 23 September, 2017Matching Fragments
6.15. PW15 HC Shripal Sharma was assigned the investigation of DD No. 26A lodged by Smt Shashi Bala. Carbon copy of missing person form is Ex.PW15/A. On the same day evening, he visited the house of Smt. Shashi Bala and interrogated her and she repeated the same facts as disclosed in DD no.26A. He collected photograph of the missing person Mark PW7/1 and got published hue and cry notice on public places. Copy of hue and cry notice is Ex.PW15/B. He made efforts to search the missing person but no clue could come forward till 22.03.2014. On 23.03.2014, at about 7.00 or 8.00 A.M., relatives of Inderpal namely Dinesh Kumar, Sanjay Kumar along with other persons came to P.S. and disclosed that they had suspicion over Tinku in disappearance of Inderpal. He called Tinku through Ct. Sonu and interrogated him. Tinku disclosed that on 17.03.2014, he along with Shashi Bala committed the murder of Inderpal in his room and throw the dead body in the area of Khajuri Pushta, Yamuna Khadar. He disclosed the facts of the incident to Insp. Jitender Singh and produced Tinku before him. He also verified the aforesaid facts from Tinku. Tinku Singh led police team and got removed one torso wrapped in a yellow red colour cloth piece having flowers from five jute and plastic bags from in decomposed condition. Maggots were present on the body and hands which were FIR No. 282/14 5 State Vs.Tinku Singh etc. 19 of 82 tied from back by white plastic rope. Insp. Jitender Singh prepared rukka Ex.PW1/1 at place of recovery of torso on the basis of DD no.15A and sent to P.S. through Ct. Anil for registration of FIR. IO called crime team. IO prepared site plan of the place of recovery of torso and seized vide seizure memo Ex.PW8/B. Five white plastic bags, two jute bags with orange cloth and rope were also seized by separated seizure memo. Tinku also got recovered the head of the body In the meantime, private videographer Amar Chand Tiwari was also called for videography. Head was in semi decomposed and maggots were present, but body was identifiable. On seeing the head and face, Dinesh Kumar and Sanjay Kumar identified the dead body and claimed to be of Inderpal. Head was taken into possession vide seizure memo Ex.PW8/C. IO prepared joint site plan of place of recovery of torso and place of recovery of head and got removed the dead body to GTB Hospital for postmortem through Ct. Sachin. He was deputed at the place of recovery of head when police team visited the house of deceased. He has identified the jute bag as Ex.P-1 colly, rope used to tie the hands of deceased as Ex.P-2, muddy plastic katta and one polythene bag as Ex.P-3 colly and underwear of deceased as Ex.P-4.
FIR No. 282/14 5 State Vs.Tinku Singh etc. 27 of 82 Postmortem peeling and busters were present all over the body. Marbling was present. Scalp hair were loose and easily pluckable. Teeth were loose. Maggots were present all over the body and more on the neck. Plastic nylon rope was tied on left hand which was extended to right knee joint below with fixed type of knot. She observed following injuries as under:
1. Wound in the size measuring 4 x 0.5 cm muscles deep present over anterior aspect of left thigh, 18 cm above knee joint with margins and base covered and eaten up by maggots with extravsation of blood present.
2. Wound of size 8 x 0.5 cm bone deep present over the right dorsal arm,12 cm below acromium with margins and base covered and eaten up by maggots.
3. Wound of size 3.5 x 0.5 cm muscles deep present over the right dorsal arm, 1 cm below and lateral to injury no. 2. Margins and base of wound are covered and eaten up by maggots.
4. Wound of size 9.5 x 0.5 cm bone deep present over neutral aspect of right arm, 12 cm below the acromium with margins and base of wound covered and eaten up by maggots.
Time since Death was about one week but cause of death could not be given for the want of chemical analysis of viscera. However on examination of viscera report, it was opined that decapitation of body was present by a sharp edged weapon but, due to putrefaction and FIR No. 282/14 5 State Vs.Tinku Singh etc. 28 of 82 eating away of tissues by maggots, it could not be opined whether the decapitation was ante-mortem or postmortem. Further, the soft tissues of neck had been eaten up by maggots. The viscera report is negative for common poisons. PM report is Ex.PW22/A. Subsequent opinion Ex.PW24/J furnished by her on the basis of viscera report.