Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the complainant/opposite party no.2 submitted that the petitioner is guilty of suppression of material facts and as such the revisional application is liable to be dismissed in limine. According to the learned advocate the accused/petitioner has cheated the complainant which would be evident from their conduct as they refused to acknowledge the complainant. To that effect attention of the Court was drawn to the paragraph 26 of the FIR. It was submitted that the contents of the said paragraph itself would reflect that the G.M. (Corporate Marketing) of the accused company/petitioner alleged that they did not know any company named as M/s. Eden Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. till they received the letter dated December 13, 2019 from the complainant company and as such they do not recognize the complainant company nor the contract and the MOU signed amongst the four parties. Such version of the accused company/petitioner surprised the complainant as the same was for deceiving the complainant company for the purposes of realising revenue by the complainant company from Asansol Municipal Corporation.