Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: backdated agreements in Vasanth Kumar vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation LtdMatching Fragments
6. The next question is whether the approach road was available with the petitioner at the time of submitting the application on 27.8.2011. It is admitted that there is no requirement to furnish the details of the approach road along with the application. The principal contention taken by the petroleum company in the counter-affidavit and the additional counter-affidavit is that on the date of field verification, the approach road, now claimed to have the width of 7 meters as per Ext.P9, was not there as claimed by the petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner did not WP(C).No.9474/2014-H. produce Ext.P9 along with Exts.P7 and P8. The respondent relies on Ext.R1(a). The case of the respondent company is that Ext.P9 agreement is backdated and procured after the field verification was completed.