Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

16. That accused (A­1) had inherited 37 Kanal and 12 marla of land in the year 1971­72 at village Pabsara, District Sonepat, Haryana, shown as inherited, although his father was still active and alive at that time. At the same time, accused had shown as 'gifted' a residential plot of 100 sq. yards, costing Rs.20,000/­(without giving details of the address etc. and purchase cost etc.) and the agricultural land in Sonepat, District Rohtak, Haryana, ad­measuring six acres(without giving its details and address etc) shown as 'inherited' from his father. That the said IPRs were also not been put up to the senior officers for acceptance by the concerned clerk, who is not traceable now.

30. That the total assets of accused (A­1) at beginning of the check period i.e. 01.01.1977 are agricultural land at Tehsil Sonepat, District Rohtak, which is stated to be inherited from his father as per IPR submitted for the year 1971­1972 with the value of the land shown as Rs.30,000/­ and besides this a residential plot of land at B­60, East of Kailash acquired for the value of Rs.20,000/­ on which a sum of Rs.57,500/­ were spent on construction from 1972­1975 and the total value of this asset is shown as Rs. 77,500/­. That there was no property in the name of his wife accused (A­2) or their children at the beginning of the check period.

Nehru Place from Slidex Security Services Rental income from 1214, Hemkunt Tower from 1,56,691 1986 to 1988 from M/s Modi Rubber Advance rent in 1988 adjusted in the sale price at 66,780 214, Devika Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi Income from sale of 300 shares of M/s DCM 20,000 Total 3,77,833 Income of Brijesh Bansal Rental income from 1209A, Devika Tower from 1,12,266 M/s Max 1985­88 Total 1,12,266 Income of Kavita Bansal Lottery Prize won in 77th draw of UP State lottery 34,300 (Dhanlaxmi) in 1980 Income by way of share in rent from 508A, 62,652.5 Devika Tower from M/s TCIL during check period Total 96,952.5 Income of Namita Bansal Income by way of share in rent from 508A, 62,652.5 Devika Tower from M/s TCIL during check period Total 62,652.5 Assets at the beginning of check period Immovable assets of accused Ram Bhaj Bansal Agricultural land at District Rohtak, Tehsil­ 30,000 Sonepat(inherited) 1971­72 Residential plot at B­60, East of Kailash, New 77,500 Delhi and construction cost thereof 1971­75 Total 1,07,500 CBI vs. Ram Bhaj Bansal & Anr. 26 of 199 pages Assets at the end of check period Immovable assets of accused Ram Bhaj Bansal Agricultural land at District Rohtak, Tehsil­ 30,000 Sonepat(inherited) 1971­72 Residential plot at B­60, East of Kailash, New 77,500 Delhi and construction cost thereof 1971­75 Total 1,07,500 Immovable assets in the name of accused Kaushalya Bansal M­138, GK­II, New Delhi 21,31,829 B­279, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase­I, New Delhi 16,84,432 B­107, DLF Model Town, Faridabad 5,689.5 213, Block B, DLF Model Town, Sector­11, 12,849.5 Faridabad (300 sq. yards) 156 Block G, Sector­10, DLF Faridabad (250 sq. 8,447.5 yards) Plot no. 86A, Block­B, 346 sq. yards, sector­11, 7,241 Faridabad B­14(Basement), Deepali 92, Nehru Place 47,930.4 1214, Hemkunt Tower, Nehru Place 2,77,869 27, Ankur Vihar Plot, Ghaziabad 72,716 214, Devika Tower, 6 Nehru Place 2,51,750 Total 45,00,753.9 Immovable assets in the name of Brijesh Bansal Flat no. 1209A, Pragati Devika Tower, Nehru 1,26,000 Place, New Delhi Flat no. 101C, Raja Towers, Nehru Place 53,300 Total 1,79,300 Immovable assets in the name of Namita and Kavita Bansal Flat no. 101D, Raja Towers, Nehru Place 65,100 Flat no. 508, Pragati Devika Tower, Nehru Place, 1,36,500 New Delhi Total 2,01,600 Expenditure during check period CBI vs. Ram Bhaj Bansal & Anr. 27 of 199 pages Accused Ram Bhaj Bansal's expenditure Household expenditure (1/3rd of net salary) 71,781.16 Expenses as mentioned by accused Ram Bhaj 44,815 Bansal in IPRs submitted by him during the check period LIC Premium, chit fund etc as mentioned in 1,98,104.22 various IPRs submitted Total 3,14,700.38 Brijesh Bansal's expenditure Maintenance charges paid to Devika Estate P 2,340 Ltd.

46. At the very outset, it is to be noted that there is no dispute over the propositions of law enunciated in the case law, cited above.

47. I have carefully gone through the entire relevant material appearing on record and have given considered thought to the same. I have also considered the rival arguments that have been advanced, at the bar. My findings are as under:

48. PW1, Sh. Kuldeep Kumar was posted as Halqa Patwari at Nangal Kalan, Sonepat, during the relevant period.