Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ganeshan vs M/S Megacity Developers & Builders ... on 12 February, 2015

     ITEM NO.98                              REGISTRAR COURT. 2                    SECTION XVII

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                             BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

     Civil Appeal                 No(s).     9373-9388/2011

     GANESHAN & ORS.                                                             Appellant(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     M/S MEGACITY DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS P.LD.                                    Respondent(s)


     WITH
     C.A. No. 9389-9391/2011
     C.A. No. 9392-9454/2011
     C.A. No. 9455/2011
     C.A. No. 9456-9466/2011
     C.A. No. 9467-9487/2011
     C.A. No. 9488-9493/2011
     C.A. No. 9496-9516/2011
     C.A. No. 9517-9522/2011
     C.A. No. 9524/2011
     (With Office Report)

     Date : 12/02/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.


     For Appellant(s)                        Ms.Shweta Parihar,adv.
                                             Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni,Adv.
                                             Mr.Shubham Jaiswal,adv.
                                             M/s. Lex Regis Law Offices,Adv.
                                             Mrs. Vaijayanthi Girish,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)
                                             Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv.

                                             Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv.


                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

The office report is that in all the matters numbered above, Signature Not Verified the Digitally signed by Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.02.14 appearing respondents have failed to file the statement of case, 11:03:35 IST Reason: although they have been notified to do so by notice dated 19.06.14 …..........2 ITEM NO.98 -2- of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar SB