Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Suresh dhanak in The State Of Maharashtra vs Arman Gulzar Tadavi & Others on 12 March, 2015Matching Fragments
However, PW-9 Sk. Gafur Sk. Wajir, in his evidence stated that, there was some dispute between Rangya and accused on account of cattle. He had intervened in their dispute.
Accused Yuvraj used to tell that, he will kill Rangya.
Rangya had paid an amount of Rs.1000/- to Yuvraj.
However, this witness has not stated that, Sarpanch intervened in the dispute, and tried to settle the dispute as stated by the PW-6. PW-8-Suresh Puna Dhanake, in his evidence stated that, about 7-8 months prior to the 147.1996 Cri.Appeal.odt murder, some altercations were going on between Ramjan and accused No.3 Supadu in front of his house. He had intervened between them, and thereafter, he did not know anything more. PW-7 Sk. Nazir Sk. Wajir stated that, the accused had stolen three bullocks of Rangya about 15 days prior to Urus. Rangya had come to PW-7, and requested him to intervene. Sk. Gafur Sk. Wajir and Syd.Tukadu Syd.